Bus shelters vandalism

Broken glass near bus shelters are a common scene here in Melbourne. Especially after a long weekend and during school holidays. I drove past many bus and tram shelters last long weekend, I lost counts of the numbers of shelters/stops that looked like the picture on the left.
These smashed broken glass pose serious safety hazards to commuters and they are also very expensive to replace too. And after replacement, these glass panels get vandalised and broken again. It is a never ending cycle of breaking and replacing. It’s tax payers like I that have to pay the bill.
I am sure the money can be better spent somewhere else, like in schools and hospitals.
I reckon bus shelters should be simple, just a roof and no glass panels. This way, vandals that do not have respect over other people’s property will have less delicate things to ‘play’ with. If they are caught vandalising these shelters, they should foot the bill. Repeat offenders of vandalism should be caned! This should pose as a huge deterrence to would-be vandals.
With this law in place, public utilities such as the train and bus shelters will be free of vandalism, or maybe less vandalism.
What do you think?
| Print article | This entry was posted by Kee on April 9, 2010 at 2:27 pm, and is filed under General. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 year ago
Hi there,
We have the bus shelter problem in the UK, too. Our research has suggested that one of the reasons it happens is a side-effect of the shelter manufacturers using toughened glass panels. Also use in car windscreens, toughened glass is designed to beak into very small, relatively blunt pieces when broken. Unfortunately, for vandals this makes for an impressive display when they strike a bus shelter glass panel with a hard object.
One way to counter this aesthetic experience (a significant reward for the vandal) is to coat both sides of the glass panel with a thin plastic laminate. This is easily done and is relatively cheap. Now when a panel is struck, the glass will still break in around the area it has been struck, but is held in place by the laminate. There is no longer the ‘crash’ of the glass breaking and falling to the street, and so the motive is greatly reduced. Such ‘impressive display’ factors are important when considering acts of vandalism undertaken (usually) by a member of a group, as their desire to ‘impress’ their peers is an significant motivator for committing the offence.
Hope this is useful.
A.
about 1 year ago
There are times that i dont read more than two lines but i think you have a unique blog. Grats !